Sense, communication, information, language of the beings

Sense, Communication, Information, Language of the beings


Why when we order variously words, signification is it different ?, wondered Pascal without having answered ever.
What can we say of languages which enable beings to play their rôle, even, from assuming their destiny ?

-------------------

Let's consider first, means of recognition used by the ants, means often evoked by the sociologists.
We know for example, that when several roads are leading to a source of food, very quickly, the ants privilege one of these ways,
the privileged way is then, the one that is marked by biggest number of olfactive molecules secreted by these insects.
According to current speeches of scientists this fact would result from powers devolved by genes, and these olfactive molecules would be necessary to the "information competitiveness".

We must be rigorous.
If there is an "information competitiveness" this fact presupposes of sense's vectors, and therefore, implication of a creative entity to recognize and to judge characteristics of this vectors.
Indeed, an olfactive molecule cannot be efficient (active) without characteristics's interpretation of the electromagnetic waves, vectors of the sense, associated to particles and to atoms that constitute this molecule.

More precisely, the ants, due to their only biophysical state, are unable to recognize a road (and their "sisters") ; it's necessary that a same creative entity, master of the "sense", singularized in each of them, judges the frequencies and amplitudes of the electromagnetic waves associated to olfactive molecules,
and it, using an universal references system (an universal values system).

As for bees, they can mean and transmit "situation" of food zones with dances.
So, more these zones are near to hive, more the dance is frantic, whereas angle between the dance's axis and the vertical, depends of the orientations " hive - sun "and " zone of food - sun ".
Consequently, to them only, these facts give evidence :
- "realism"of a language that enables from transmitting the behaviors's interpretation,
- "existence" of a beyond of the reality : the abstraction domain of the insects, ipso facto, of all beings.

Man, naturally, utilizes to express himself, means which depend on his abstraction capacities and experiences, particularly that depend of his education.
Evolution of his language since childhood until adulthood, is significant in this respect :
newborn child shows his presence by shouts and simple gestures,
child employs words and small sentences,
teenager, having "digested" all the complexities of his language, is using elaborated sentences and can make speeches,
scholar has subtle and esoteric formalizations.

Another essential precision, these divers languages necessitate the biophysical activities of some organs (hands, throat ..., brain), however, this fact does not mean that an organ, particularly brain, is an operator who recognize, judge, … and decide.

With man, we also know that these languages concern cerebral areas very specialized, areas that interact (Broca's and Wernicke's areas, ..., areas that enable from treating numbers, sounds, forms, movements, ...),
and are necessitating ceaseless reorganizations of synaptical connections in order to associate, mix, "mature", ..., the mental creations as the virtual images, concepts, ideas ... and anticipations which are in abstraction domain.

Nevertheless, a theory about the cognitive which is founded only on biological facts, never will answer to the inevitable problematic rarely, even, never evoked :
what is creative entity who means with words, sentences, formalizations, virtual images, instructions, … ?

Remarkable fact also, although we know how to mean in a conscious way, the "how" of the sense (of the letters, words, sentences, ...) escapes us.
For example, physicists develops extremely esoteric formalizations without knowing anything about primordial cause which enable them to establish correlations between sensitive reality and their virtual (abstract) representations of the phenomena.

There are therefore of internal comprehensions which do not emerge from consciousness state and the conscious understanding of the sense does not result from only use of rules and practices.
Concerning these problems, John Searle interrogated himself for a long time without bringing a credible answer; according to him (and for the majority of the current philosophers): " there are neurobiological processes which are raw and blind and there is consciousness, but nothing else ".

Thus, don't be surprised that are blooming vague expressions, even hazy, as :
"understanding it's something as rules transparency",
"... as fruit of an unconscious guiding ",
"we understand a physical theory when a compatible interpretation with its mathematical structure enables from considering this structure as a means ... ".

We must repeat again,
there is no transfer and memorization of "sense" without the recognition and interpretation of characters of electromagnetic waves which are inexorably associated to sense's vectors,
innate interpretation, or innate and conscious interpretation made by using of universal value’s references.
Who interprets ?
The consciousness ?
Sure, no.

*

We know it henceforth, all beings, whatever is their complexity level, are object of ceaseless transfers, within their body, of instructions with biological effects and instructions with behavioral effects, even instructions with death-carrying effects.
Let's quote the informations fluxes at elementary level of the individuals which necessitate of polyvalent molecules that are said inhibitor, ..., modulator and messenger, and which are present in several animal species, even, vegetable species.

Also, let's think to recognition and to permanent interpretation of memorized instructions (directives) on DNA by means of about 60.000 genes,
instructions requiring only four bases : Cytidine (C), Adenosine (A), Guanosine (G) and Thymidine (T).

Consequently, sense and its transmission, particularly by language, cannot be considered as only owed to social interactions as say nowadays, "upholders" of the human sciences.
Therefore, let's beware to speeches's simplicity as :
"… the language … it is always of the social act that it has its power and for regulation of the social act that it is applied (Cf. M. Deleau - The social origins of the mental development).

Yes, language is an effective "tool" for structuring the psychism,
a tool that nourishs, stabilizes, crystallizes cerebral activities around abstract poles (for example, the concepts),
yes, language enables beings to live in their environment, in particular social,
nevertheless, it's essentially a transmission tool of transcendent activities that presupposes a creative entity, "master of the sense", who has powers on the energies and things (inert matter).

Due to this fact and as for primordial causes, we recognize no difference between the beings's languages, of conscious expression or innate, and we consider even, that some of these languages enable from establishing biomass and its interactions.
Too, we observe that conscious language is, and will always be, "extremely poor" compared to the number and to the complexity of the necessary instructions for body's dynamics, and for dynamics of the life's phenomenon.

Why is it so ?,
why the essential orders (instructions, directives ...) do not emerge to consciousness state then that "creative entity" who recognizes herself in us, by the I (ego, subject, spirit), takes them into account, constantly, at every structural level of the body ?
Is not it because this entity cannot surmount mysterious, inexorable and universal constraints ?
We are convinced of it.

On the other hand, knowing that all interactions with environment, all speeches, …, all transmissions of "sense", necessitate molecular structures of the body,
why not to interrogate us more :
until what internal level of our body and, ipso facto, until what structural level of "inert matter", our conscious world's understanding, has an influence ?

Are we not necessary to creative entity of divine character, who "leads" world, of all eternity ?

*

Having recognized three big successive stages of the language's development :
- first, commonplace pictography which enables reproducing, in an extremely simplified way, of the reality's perceptions ; pictography was used by our distant ancestors, it enabled them from transcribing on various supports, "virtual images of the reality " located in their abstraction domain, images which were not different of ours (think to prehistoric drawings which decorate the caves, notably, Lascaux's cave),
- next, ideography, expression of a more subtle world's understanding that associates proto-concepts to pictograms,
- and the phonetic language with its soundwaves,

besides, considering that primitive writing (cuneiform) appeared in low Mesopotamia towards end of the millennium IV before J.C., a writing that was followed by Egyptian hieroglyph and Chinese ideogram,

nowadays, of numerous linguists recognize in the Sumerians the first men (people) really able of thinking.

We find again, ambiguity of the word "think" ; indeed, according the speechs, the thinking is considered as an operator or fruit of the brain’s activities.
When we are thinking, let us be precise and rigorous, we initiate and manage activities of transcendent order, that enable from elaborating concepts, ideas, equations, anticipations ...

Therefore, the Sumerians were not first men who thought, but they has been the first ones who actualized (materialized to become realities) on things, on clay, cerebral potentiality that enable from counting (for information : eighty percent of cuneiforms Sumerian are numeric data concerning trade).

Consequently, nothing is more erroneous than to consider the language, in particular the writing, as producers of transcendency.
On the contrary, it is because our I (ego, subject, spirit) is of transcendent order that we can lead abstract activities and express some with the language !

*

Biologists notice that orders (instructions,directives) at molecular level, for biological effects, for behavioral effects and even, for death-giving effects, necessary for beings's dynamics, are not affected by changes of transmission processes.
Thus, these singular languages are not "altered" when they "cross" synapses.
More exactly, these instructions are not modified when they cross the neuronal interfaces, and it, in spite of different vectors : biochemical molecules or electric signals,
essential fact foreseen by Loewy and, today, unanimously recognized.
Why is it so ?
Is not it because the meta-vectors (the primordial vectors) of the "sense" are electromagnetic waves ?
Certainly.
Let us insist because this fact is rich of philosophic and theological information.

For example, with regard to the smells perception,
recently, two scientists, Richard Axel and Linda B. Buck, (Nobel 2004), working physiology of the olfactory system, have revealed existence of biological receivers sensitive to fragrant molecules, receivers situated near membrane of certain cells.
Naturally, nowadays it is not necessary to be a specialist to assert that these receivers are efficient because their molecules are "sensitive" to electromagnetic waves which characterize a smell,
more exactly because their molecules are sensitive to the mix of several electromagnetic waves, of different frequencies, that characterize a smell.
However and regrettably,
these researchers said nothing about activation process of these receivers,
said nothing about creative entity who, in every being, recognizes and uses smells vectors !

Biologists observe also, that :
- on one hand, for a type of piece of information (direction, noises, vibrations, pressures, light, ...) concerned sense organ has a big number of detectors ; think to millions of receptors as light-sensitive cells of the retina,
- on the other hand, the biological receptors collect signals which are transformed in wave peaks and transmitted to brain by nerves,
and conclude then :
"Utilization of numerous receptors enables inter-correlations that an unique receptor does not enable, …,
the biological structures, receptors and intelligence interact.",
a summary conclusion which justifies important remarks.

The biological structures, whatever they are, therefore the biological sensors, are not at all operators able of recognitions, of choices, of judgments, of interactions, ...,
they enable interactions and creation activities more or less interdependent, what is very different !
As for intelligence, it's a set of faculties that characterize creative entity who recognizes herself in the I (ego, subject, spirit), and who has power to transcend the things, from judging them and utilizing them.
What is also very different, admit it !

*

Thus, all the biologic sensors have a common property :
they enable from detecting and transmitting meta-vectors (primordial vectors) of the "sense" and these are electromagnetic waves.

Let us argue more,
contrary to what is commonly said, things (reality's states) have not a narrow contact, in particular, there is not a perfect contact between the skin and its outside.
Skin is indeed constituted by molecules, atoms and particles (about 1000 billion atom in a cell),
and all these elements are separated by a similar vacuum to cosmic vacuum.

Therefore, and knowing that every element of matter is characterized by the electromagnetic waves which are associated to itself inexorably (any state of the reality vibrates),
true information vectors which cross skin, are electromagnetic waves, the only ones that can cross quantum vacuum.

Besides, redundance of the biological receptors (their big number), enables more reliability of the sensorial organs,
and from removing some aleatory disturbances of the sensorial perceptions.
In other words, multiplication of the detection points enables from amplifying "useful" character of the perceptions by elimination after their mixing, of some aleatory electromagnetic waves.

So, the interactions which we maintain with our environment, in a sense the universal language which unites us with the reality, depends entirely on the recognition and interpretation of characters of specific electromagnetic waves.

Talking of this,
absorption of photons by photosynthetic proteins during photosynthesis phenomenon is rich in information.
We know henceforth that these proteins are structured in crowns and constitute extremely complex molecular sets including chlorophyll molecules and amino acid chains in helix form.

We also know that the photons which penetrate into the photosynthetic proteins :
- first of all, visit successively several hundreds of these annular structures in lapses of time of tenth of millionths of billionths of second (it's an estimation),
- afterwards, are absorbed by specialized proteins which recover the calorific energy.
But then, why do photons visit these annular structures ?

Having noted that photons show an unique excitement, "interfere" only with themselves (photons do not react between them) and cannot be copied, we do not hesitate to say that due to electromagnetic waves which characterize them,
they are meta-information's vectors, even, unchanging primordial instructions vectors concerning universe, ipso facto, life's phenomenon.
Interpretation of electromagnetic waves characters, therefore is an universal necessity.

Today, with the scientific "revelations", we are walking on new and difficult Damascus roads, difficult but nevertheless rich in credible expectations !

Let's dream with the neutrinos.

Electromagnetic waves that are associated to photons, are they the only ones "ambassadors" of the divine world's nobility ?
What can we say about neutrinos which cross universe ?

It has been Pauli who, the first one, after experiments on radioactivity, and for to respect sacrosanct principle of energy's preservation, imagined this particle with a mass smaller than that of the classic particles (billions of times),
hypothesis confirmed in 1950s.

Any physical structure emits them (stars, planets, objects and beings) ; from our body would escape from it of 3000 to 6000/s.
The neutrinos are crossing densest states of the inert matter almost at speed of light ; for example, to reduce of half, a stream of these particles, a wall of lead having an equivalent thickness to one light-year (ly), would be necessary.
Besides, although their mass is extremely small, because of their number they would represent energy of all the stars.

So, we are plunged in a bath of neutrinos and we can assert that if we had eyes adapted, we would perceive world with a neutrinos lighting.
Then, what would be our perception of the reality ?

Knowing that numerous photons streams reveal past states of the world, we can believe that streams of neutrinos are bearers of original information concerning universe's history.
In particular, what instructions do they transport in universe after they have crossed our body, and more generally, what information are conveyed by the particles that permanently, we exchange with Pierre, Paul, ... and cosmos ?

*

What aberration,
how intelligentsia can she believe that laws and processes manage universe,
a disastrous "drift" (an error) of understanding, which is diffused by the scientists and admitted, without opposition, by the philosophers and theologians.
All phenomena and processus necessitate transmission of information and instructions, that is a language.

Here are new arguments ; let's consider process which enables control of ceaseless micro-bleedings, notably in the articulations.
Observation of good sense :
so that such bleedings are controlled (limited), naturally, they must be recognized and treated,
facts which presuppose extremely subtle faculties(and powers) and biophysical processes very complex and effective.

More exactly, it is necessary from judging the physical and chemical micro unbalances induced by micro blood effusions, and it, by taking into account numerous value references,
and for stopping these bleedings, it is also necessary to know and to use specific processes leading to blood's coagulation,
processes which must be integrated into precise chronologies,
what notably requires mastery of durations, these intervals which are not space but of transcendent order.

What can we say then, about creative entity who having detected bleedings, by means of directives with biological effects, orders punctual and almost immediate use of coagulation process of blood,
what can we say about this operator, master of the time ?

We must analyze in a same way, haemophilia.
Formerly lived as a curse of God, this illness (near a male child on five thousand, is affected) is henceforth treated by an effective medication.
By this treatment it is injected in patient's blood, specific molecules which enable from stabilizing the just quantity of the coagulation factors VIII and IX (today, these molecules are produced industrially with blood's plasma).

Knowing complexity of the blood's proteins (of the enzymes), can we believe that due to their only physico-chemical properties, bio molecules are responsible of the coherence and normality of the interactions necessary for maintaining blood's balances ?
Certainly no.
Nevertheless and no doubt, these molecules enable from remedying to deficiency of genetic instructions leading to such balances, what is very different.

The coagulation factors VIII and IX are also synthetized by micro-organisms, cells cultivated or animals that have corresponding human gene (a gene voluntarily placed in their embryo).
How these cells, these micro-organisms, ..., could they synthetize these coagulation factors if themselves were not memories of instructions with specific biologic effects,
specific but also inherent to life's phenomenon ?,
instructions which are elaborated by an unique creative entity who uses universal references of value.

As for transgenesis (implantation into a living organism of a foreign gene that confers upon the organism a new property that it will transmit to its descendents), if it is more delicate than foreseen, is not it on account of our big ignorance, even, of our total ignorance of the instructions that enable life's dynamics ?

Here is another essential remark :
powders which enable from treating haemophilia are effective when they are dissolved in serum, more exactly, are effective when they are dissolved in serum's water.
Let us remember old proverb : " Corpora non agunt nisi soluta " (substances do not interact unless dissolved).
What can we say about this biological (primordial) influence of the water ?
Until very recently, it was not possible to respond in a satisfactory way.

We know henceforth that water molecules which compose our body, have an influence which is more that "physico-chemical" (in number, this molecules represent 97 % of that of our organs).
Water enables memorization and diffusion of electromagnetic waves which are vectors of biological instructions necessary for life.
So, completely dehydrated bacteria (they are as inert matter but have, to potential state, of myriads of biological instructions), resume life when they are again hydrated.
In other words and more generally, it is the water that enables "actualization" (materialization for becoming realities) of myriads of biological instructions memorized, under a potential shape, into molecules which contain carbon and constitute the beings.

*

Here are another examples, among multitudes, which show realism (existence) of biological instructions and biological information, and therefore, which give evidence of a common language to beings :

* Naturally, the genetic code.

"Today, all alive bodies are made by one or several cells, surrounded of membranes ... All organisms utilize DNA as reproductible memory of genetic information, all are expressing this information by transcription of the DNA .... by the same mechanisms, and, except in of rare relatively recent exceptions, by the same genetic code. All utilize the same basic processes for groupings by paire so as to transmit their information. All make the same kind of complex metabolic reactions built around a common nucleus and catalysed by of tall proteic enzymes which generally are composed by several hundreds of amino acids and coenzymes, of which several are universally distributed …",
"Appearance of ARN is considered as an key-event which divides the protometabolism into two periods : before-ARN where dominates exclusively chemistry, and after-ARN where selection adds itself to chemistry ... " (Cf. Singularities – C. de Duve – Nobel).

Although they are necessary for understanding life's dynamics, these only major reports, cannot however satisfy philosopher and theologian.
Indeed, selections presuppose of faculties of transcendent order, that enable recognitions, judgments, … and choices ; it's an essential necessity which never is discussed, even, always ignored.

Observe, even if genetic code is sometimes object of peculiarities,
it is unanimously recognized universal, structured, combinatorial, optimized at best,
so many characters which show that it is not fact of accidental processes, hazard's product or fruit of a natural selection.

For example, let’s consider optimization ; although there is at genetic level, a redundancy of the information and instructions,
- on one hand, optimization of the genetic code presupposes the same "intention", otherwise, these information and these instructions would be "annihilated",
- on the other hand, let's repeat again, the information and instructions necessitate ceaseless taking into consideration of numerous references, notably, of durations.

Biological replication is, too, particularly rich in quest of primordial causes.
So, even if DNA replication is made in a similar way that the one of ARN, this replication shows a research of more reliability.
According to C. de Duve :
"DNA replication is subjected to a supplementary control by of specific enzymes which correct, so that most of the erroneous assortments are detected and suppressed ....
With this control, the exactness of DNA replication enormously exceeds the one of ARN, reaching the rate of error fantastically low of one DNA incorrectly inserted on approximately a billion." (Cf. Singularities).

Consequently, what is creative entity who is responsible of this process because, naturally, enzymes do not control ?
Enzymes, specific molecular structures, sometimes enable verifyings, what is quite different.

As for evolutive stages of the life's phenomenon, if they are various and interdependent, we are convinced that it is on account of ceaseless creation activities and of the sacrificial world's character.
Think to creative activities within the germs, which make them progressively insensible, to chemical molecules that must kill them.

Why not to say anything about this mysterious, imperious and universal need to create ?,
who can ignore the universal constraints ?

* " Migration of cells" and "specialization of cells".
We know that migration means of cells matters little because the original cells are the same ; they "settle" there where they are necessary and there where they are "asked".
These almost immediate adaptations, made without errors, therefore show that extremely quick precise instructions,
are transmitted by means of sense's vectors,
by means of a language until elementary levels of the beings.


* The genetic abnormalities, as the drepanocyt and the thalassemia, which protect from malaria given by the Plasmodium falciparum, a parasite conveyed by mosquitoes.

Do you believe that these genetic deficiencies lead to a variation of physico-chemical properties of the body which enable from neutralizing malaria ?
We do not think.
Interactions between body and malaria are more than physico-chemical interactions ; they are also composed of ceaseless instructions with biological effects, even, of instructions with behavioral effects.

* Among the singular languages within body, too let's quote the instructions that are leading to cells death and which are necessary for beings's development.

*

In conclusion,
world's dynamics, inert and animate, necessitates permanent exchanges of energy, and of "sense" by means of languages.

More particularly, life requires individualization, interdependence and instructions transmissions.
At elementary level of our body, for example,
- individuality of any cell is made by an extremely flexible permeable membrane,
- interdependence by fluxes of energies, information, and biological instructions.

As a consequence and knowing that universal laws cannot recognize, judge, …, decide and act,
we are convinced that we evolve in a cyber world,
Cogito ergo mundus vivit (I think, therefore world is living),
and we postulate life's phenomenon as result of creation activities which enabled of significant increases of instructions fluxes in an inert matter containing the carbon.

Let us remember John’s gospel :
"In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God,
and the Word was fully God.
The word was with God in the beginning.
All things were created by him,
and apart from him not one thing was created that has been created." (1, 1-2-3) !

What can we say about the "links" between this Word and the creative entity ,
master of the universal language, particularly of beings's languages,
master of the "sense" and therefore of the time,
who recognize herself in the I (me, ego, spirit) ?


Paul Moyne
www.paulmoyne.com