Relativity and neutrinos

Theory deposited at Academy of Sciences, in Paris, into sealed envelope n°  17 990

To those who believe that we can understand the world only by means of scientific theories and formulae, and who believe to power of laws and principles, even to chance.

                                                    *******************  

H. In. Lorentz (on 1853 - 1928), probably the first one, establishes some mathematical equations about the perception of phenomena situated in "reference systems" that are moving themselves with different speeds ; more exactly, it was relations between rays of light (photons) emitted by a "object" and their perceptions and interpretations, by an observer who is moving with a different speed ; essentially, it was three equations, 
two two equations of transformation : 
       

and one (the) coefficient of relativity : 

 where,

t represents time ( the durations),

v and c characterize speeds, notably c (km/s 299.792,458), constant in vacuum, that is recognized as the biggest possible speed.

Having admitted these equations, A. Einstein (1879 - 1955) expressed their quintessence, postulating that " the energy E of a material point of mass m, is not got by : mv ²/2, but by mc ² / (1 - v ²/c ²) ½,

or, when this expression is developed in series, by : mc ² + mv ²/2 + m (3/8) (v ²/c) ² +…, (postulate of the restricted relativity - 1905).

The third term of the series and those which follow are very small, and can be neglected, it thus remains :

- mc ² representing the intrinsic energy of a body of mass : m, because this term is constant (independent of the speed v),

- mv ²/2, equation of the kinetic energy used in the classic mechanics.

H Poincaré (1854 - 1912), the most eminent mathematician of this time, had anticipated too, intimate connections between the energy and the matter, nevertheless he has not had the  "boldness" of Einstein.

Afterwards, in 1915, Einstein emitted the general relativity theory which is a relativist theory of the gravitation that allows to understand the influence of the matter (of the masses) on the cosmic movements, notably on the trajectories of the photons which have certainly a very small mass but sufficient as to be diverted by the celestial bodies.

Nowadays, the equations of the relativity, ceaselessly more esoteric, are reserved to specialists !

*

Since Einstein, the time is associated with the space by the notion of space-time, as if the space and the time had the same nature (the same order), even, as if the space-time was an operator who manages the cosmic behaviors.

But the time is a universal potentiality which becomes reality only after actualization (materializations to become reality) in durations, these mysterious intervals which are not of the space.

Besides this precision concerning the notion of space-time, what have we retained and published ? :

- these equations concern the behaviors of vectorial systems because the supports of the values as the speeds, the lengthes and the durations, are vectors, what "restrains" this relativity,

- the energy is united to the mass in a single sense (E = mc ²), while according to the interpretation of numerous cosmic observations, there is in the universe, of the matter which become again energy, even, of the  mpatter which "regains" its primordial state, timeless and without dimensions, of Universal Energy, what allows to regenerate the world permanently,

a fact that we specified by the reversible formula : E ↔ mc².

 
What can we say concerning the neutrinos, these entities of energy the least massive observed by the man ?
Their maximum speed, is it superior to that of the light (to that of the photons) ?
It is extremely difficult to answer by means of experiments because the speed of the neutrinos can be measured only during their passage through our planet, while that of the photons is measured in the cosmic space.
On the other hand, if it is shown that this maximum speed is effectively superior, will not lead to a scientific revolution as say the media, even, the comments of certain physicists.
Indeed, in the equation of the restricted relativity, the speed of light is represented by a simple letter: : c ; therefore, even if the neutrinos go faster that the photons and because they are also vectors of information, do not change the logics of reasoning and their outcome : E ↔ mc², more exactly, do not change the essential fact :

the energy can become matter and the matter can become energy.

Furthermore, if our sense organs had been conceived to perceive the neutrinos, we "would" understand" the world by a "neutrinonical" lighting, instead of seeing it by means of a "photonical" lighting ! 

Nevertheless, knowing the comportment of the neutrinos, we must be more interrogative as for the massification of the universal energy ; according to us, as soon as there is formation of a mass entity, its biggest speed depends on the degree of "massification".

Inexorably also, as soon as there is formation of a mass entity, connections, constraints, specificities, polarizations, value references and abilities to react appear and diversify themselves according to the complexity level of the matter ; so, let's quote : 

- the connections as the four fundamental interactions : electrostatic, of gravitation, strong interaction (nuclear force which enables the cohesion of the protons and neutrons in the atomic nuclei) and weak interaction,

- the universal constraints, in particular the one according to which electrons associated to an atom must have, each, a quantum state different from the others (principle of Pauli),

- the polarizations, electric and magnetic, which allow the omnipresence in the reality, of electromagnetic waves which are primordial vectors of the sense,

primordial vectors because these waves are the only ones who can cross all the vacuums, in particular the quantum vacuum,

- the specificities expressed by the physicists, in particular the colors: red, blue and green, recognized to quarks, these colors being however purely symbolic because quarks cannot be observed separately,

- the value references, in particular those that we qualify as physical and that we quantify (mass, length, …,duration, …, speed) ; by the way, why are we conscious of moral values which are not of physical order (of physical nature) ?,

- the abilities to react rarely evoked in the metaphysical  speeches, which allow increases of complexity of the reality's states and their interactions,

increases of complexity which have however limits as give evidence of that, the ceaseless cosmic evolutions and the life's phenomenon.

Besides, these abilities to react, well known of scientists as the chemists,reveal various states of the energy : kinetic, thermal, electric, magnetic, …, which are different from the timeless state and without dimensions which characterizes the universal energy.

Another fact remarkable, the connections, the constraints, the specificities, the polarizations, the value references and the abilities to react, inherent to the mass state, existe for eternity because the universe is eternal.

It is eternal for reason that our true life which is a spiritual life, takes place in the timeless domain of the abstraction because there are the past, the present moment without duration, and the future, and if there is timeless in us, there is, ipso facto, timeless in the universe ; obviously; the words "eternal" (in other words : an infinitely long time) and "timeless" (that is without time), are compatible only if we consider them as both facets of a "state of be without chronologies".

Let's beware then to so-called Big Bang ; as previously we have said, in eternal cycles, of universe parts are always  object, or of actualization (of materialization to become realities) of the energy, or of matter's returns to énergy state, leading to gigantic bangs !

It remains the Leibniz's question (1646, 1716) :

why is there something rather than nothing ?

We so understand, how much the implication of the time in the space by Einstein, with his notion of space-time, affects the interpretation of our world's perceptions,

and how much, the understanding of the time conditions the answers brought by the scientists, the philosophers and the theologians, to the essential questionings.

If for example, the time is recognized as an entity which passes  after having had a beginning, we admit gladly that we can look for the origin of the world and express its dynamics with scientific theories and equations, at the price of expensive researches.

On the other hand, if there is eternity in the world and if the time is a means (a potentiality), universal and eternal, which, after its materialization in durations, allows to put the evolutions in chronologies, as we previously asserted it,

not only the interpretation of numerous discoveries must be reconsidered, but also the utility of many scientific projects, in particular when they concern the particles's physics and the cosmic exploration, has to be revalued.

By the way, who quantifies, who interprets, …? because, obviously, the brain is only a means which "allows" to recognize, to judge, …, to take into consideration value references, to reconsider, …   

Is not it the creative entity who manages the universe and recognizes herself in the I (ego, subject, spirit) ?

Paul Moyne

http://www.paulmoyne.com