Moyne paul's Page

Appearance of Life, Evolution of theSpecies and Emergence of the Man

The main part of this theory is deposited to the Academy of the Sciences, Paris, in a sealed envelope n°17611

Paul Moyne


Every being is the pole (focus) of ceaseless instructions with biological effects and instructions with effects on the behaviour.
These instructions,
elaborated by means of an universal system of "values references", necessitate :
- the sense's vectors
- biological memories,
- the permanent interpretation innate (or innate and conscious) of characteristics of these vectors and memories.
Let us try to show what these facts imply as for Appearance of the Life, Evolution of the Species, Emergence of the Man.

1. Appearance of the life

1. 1. The inert matter, memory and vector of "sense"

Let us relate experiments which were led in laboratories of the Digibio company, in Paris.
Very briefly expressed,
these experiments which are founded on fact that all the particles, atoms, molecules vibrate (electromagnetic vibrations are always associated to particles, to atoms and to molecules),
appeal to two original processes :
- the first one enables picking up the biological signals which characterize the medically active molecules.
For that, it is enough to put in an electromagnetic field, a test tube containing some pure water and a drop of these molecules,
then to do a recording, under a numeric shape, of the disturbances of the electric current which generates this field.
- by second process another water, strictly pure, is subjected to a electromagnetic field modulated by means of the aforesaid recording (this new field is naturally similar to the field the disturbances of which were recorded).

Remarkable fact, after approximately 20 minutes, the water, strictly pure, is, itself, memory and vector of some characteristic signals (instructions, directives) of the experimented active products.

For the history, let's remind that these works, of which the results disturb enormously the current intelligentsia, in France were abandoned after Jacques Benveniste's death in October 2004, but have continued, still continue in United States.

1. 2. First conclusions

We remark seven essential facts :
- results of these experiments are not aleatory,
- inert matter is a memory of the "sense" and so, we are evolving in a cyberworld,
- electromagnetic waves are the primordial vectors of the directives which have biologic effects (even, of all directives),
- there is numerous electromagnetic waves, of 20 in more than 40.000 hertzes, that are associated to molecules.
- some electromagnetic waves of very very small power are indispensable to beings, others are neutral or harmful.

We think particularly of the mitogenetic radiation, composed of photons fluxes, which reveals that all the alive tissues emit information by means of certain electromagnetic waves of very very small power (intensity of the mitogenetic radiation was estimated by Russian biophysicist Alexandre Gurwitch, in the 1920s).
More extraordinary, according to works of Vlail P. Kaznatcheïev, in the Siberian department of the Russian Academy of medical sciences, pathogenic effects are also transmitted between cells, by electromagnetic waves.

- molecules are medically active mainly because they enable improving the memorization and diffusion of biological directives,
- as for water, it's a memory and a vector of instructions with biologic effects and instructions with effects on the behaviour, and even, maybe, it's an amplifier.

1. 3. Memorization and Appearance of the Life

Memorization processes at molecular level, are not therefore so commonplace as they appear at first sight.

Let's insist more and consider for example, what the current researches teach us about behavior of the water molecules to liquid state, when these are subjected to electromagnetic fields ; notably, we know that specific molecular conglomerates appear.
Nevertheless, it is not enough to say that these fields, in particular those which characterize biological or psychic reactivities of the individuals as the acts, the languages and intentions, have a direct incidence on such molecular behaviors,
because, essential fact, to every shape and greatness of these conglomerates, is associated a specific group of electromagnetic waves,
a composite group which is characterized by frequencies interferences of these waves.
So, it's extreme variety of these interferences that enables extreme variety of the biological directives.
Extraordinary versatility and wealth of this process is moreover attested by memorization mode of the genetic patrimony.

Indeed, same analysis applies to this mode founded not on use of water molecules to liquid state, but on use of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA), these two magnificent long chains of molecules formed with carbon.

Very briefly, what do we know with regard to appearance of such molecules ?
There is about 3,5 billion years, by impact of the solar energy, in particular by impact of the ultraviolet radiation (UV), water and carbon dioxide that were on earth, have reacted together to form simple molecules as the formaldehyde ; by forming oxygen, this reactions then enriched atmosphere.
At the same time, several more and more complex stable compounds of molecules with carbon, were synthesized :
polysaccharides (composed of elements C, H, O), amino acids (elements C, H, O, N) with short chains, polypeptides (with long chains of amino acids), proteins (with very long chains of amino acids), polynucleotides with the phosphor, …
All was synthetised in the primordial oceans.
Then, by facilitating synthesis of singular agglomerates (coacervates ), this oceanic symbiosis gave more subtle chemical combinations of proteins with nucleic acids, which led to the spiral structures that enable passing on, by duplication, of the biological directives, of which they are the memories (and the vectors).
It was the first-RNA (the proto RNA) which is become today, ribonucleic acid (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).

Even if this description does not translate exactly the facts, it remains that all the evolution stages of life's phenomenon, were characterized by two main way of increasings,
physico-chemical interactions increasings and biological directives increasings, what presupposes more that the omnipresence of memories :
permanent interpretation of electromagnetic waves associated to molecules which were necessary for life's appearance, to molecules which are necessary for evolutions of this phenomenon.
Evolution of circulatory and nervous systems which enable control and sense's diffusion in all organs, confirms amply this understanding.

Moreover,
why a very small quantity of some chemical elements in the body, is it necessary for the life equilibriums, and why number of these elements augments with complexity increase of the individuals ?
Is not it because increasings of memorization capacities necessitate more and more complex molecules, and thus, more and more subtle structures with new chemical elements ?

Besides and without the necessity of more arguments, we can say also, that sense's memorization at molecular level, is just like memorization which is made by means of human writing.
The molecular letters are frequencies of electromagnetic waves,
the words and biological directives are frequencies groups of these waves.

Who is recognizing them and using them ?

1. 4. Postulates

Numerous facts give so, credibility to our postulates :
- laws don't govern universe as it's ordinarily said, because the universal laws cannot recognize, judge, choose, …, decide and do ; they are only formalizations of immutable behaviours !
- we are evolving in a cyber world where directives diffusings and the emorization processes "play" an essential rôle,
- some increases of memory capacities on account of reliable complexifications of molecules containing carbon,
and so, some substantial increases of directives and of information in concerned inert matter, are among main reasons which enabled life's appearance,
- electromagnetic waves are the primordial vectors of the directives and information which enable universe's dynamics,
- life's phenomenon is an universal potentiality which is inexorably actualized as soon as certain conditions on a planet are adequate.

2. Evolution of the Species

2. 1. Brief history and current understanding.

Dynamics of the living matter is always object of "classical" ceaseless researchs but it seems today, that these will not give more information as for primordial causes.
Nevertheless the discoveries and theories made by the naturalists, the paleontologists, ..., the biologists and the neurobiologists enable us to imagine credible beyond(s) of the world rich of expectations, and for that, let us remind, briefly, main facts which characterize evolution of the species :

- the impact of the environment recognized by Jean Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829) :
" A quantity of facts teach us that when the individuals of one of our species, are changing of situation, of climate, of way of being or usually, they receive influences which change little by little consistency and proportions of their parts, of their shape, of their faculties, …
Nature by producing successively all kinds of animals, and beginning with these which are imperfect or simplest, ending its work by these which are more perfect, has complicated gradually their organization …" (Cf. Zoological philosophy),
and of the heredity, even of a law :
"Lamarck has been first man whose conclusions on subject excited much attention …
He rendered an eminent service to science declaring that each change of the organic world, as well as of the inorganic world, is result of a law, and not of an miraculous interposition. " (Cf. Charles Darwin - On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life – Preface).

- the part of the sexual selection noticed by Erasme Darwin (1731 - 1802),

- the influence of the natural selection analyzed simultaneously but independently, by Charles Darwin (1809 - 1882) and Alfred Russel Wallace (1823 - 1913) ; nevertheless Charles Darwin has been the one who has had glory publishing in 1859, with all possible speed, its theory ; here is an extract of the conclusions :
"It is interesting to contemplate a luxuriant sea-side with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects which are flitting, with worms crawling under damp earth, if we are thinking that these forms so elaborately constructed, so different but which are dependent of so complex manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.
These laws, taken in the largest sense, are : the growth's law ; the inheritance's law which presuppose almost reproduction's law ; variability law which is resulting of the indirect and direct action of the life conditions ; multiplication’s law … of which natural selection is consequence …. " (Cf. The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection).

Afterward,
- Gregor Mendel (1822 - 1884) has uncovered of laws which concern the heredity, key structure (today named gene) which enables transmission of hereditary characters, and possibility to preserve in a potential state, some of these characters,
potential state, a state extremely rich in educations but, actually, which has never been the object of debates on behalf of the philosophers and theologians.

- Oskar Hertwig (1849 - 1922) and Eduard Adolf Strasburger (1844 - 1912) have shown, by means of the microscope, that cells's nucleus is seat of the heredity and that fertilization requires union of two sex cells (gametes), male and female.

Ernst Haeckel (on 1834 - 1919) has considered that individual development (ontogenesis) is outcome of historic developments subjected to heredity's constraints (phylogenesis).
He recognized besides, some non-normalities which affect development.
We think more specially to the heterochronies which are delays or accelerations in the development chronology during ontogenesis, because chronologies necessitate the taking into consideration of the durations,
these intervals which are not of the space !
How is it possible ?

Then were revealed other singular phenomena, let's quote :
- sudden changes of class by punctual structural jumps, which were distinguished by Karl Alfred von Zittel (1839 - 1904),
of jumps which contradict principle of gradual evolution of Darwin,

- physical separation between the sexual cells and cells of the body noticed by Friedrich Leopold Weismann ( 1834 - 1914) and Moritz Nussbaum (1850 - 1915), which leads, according to them, to fact that life's experiences cannot be transmitted to genes.
Although this relative independence of the sexual cells is recognized today, we do not agree however, with this conclusion ; indeed, the sexual cells can be only independent in interdependence and it, because they are constantly fed and because primordial vectors of the genetic directives, are electromagnetic waves,
of waves which cross the molecular, atomic and quantum spaces.
In other words, we doubt the unidirectional character of the directives diffused at genetic level (current dogma of biologists) because we are "rooted" in a cyber universe where "sense" is omnipresent.

- after George Gaylord Simpson (1902 - 1984) scientists shall speak about average evolutions (horotelic evolutions), very slow evolutions (bradytelic evolutions), very fast evolutions (tachytelic evolutions), megaevolutions with change of genre, without forgetting the microevolutions and the macroevolutions dear to R Goldshmidt …

- George Ledyard Stebbins (1906 - 2000) will confirm that evolution processes for the plants and animals are identical, …

Already at this knowledge level it becomes evident that evolutions of the species are more than adaptations to environment but, in the first place, outcomes of ceaseless activities of creation that take place in the cells, and which necessitate of permanent researches of novelties,
of creations that lead to increases of complexity, and give evidence of constraints insuperable as are showing ways of evolution without outcome (the dead ways) and minor ways of evolution.
So, we are very remote from current comprehension according to which the laws and the principles govern the universe and, ipso facto, the life's phenomenon.
Let us repeat it ceaselessly, the laws and principles are not operators, they have no faculty which enable them to recognize, judge, choose, decide,... and to act !

*
Then, "penetration" of the matter by modern means of analysis, will lead to new conceptualizations :
DNA ; RNA ; messenger RNA ; enzymes ; ribosomes which are micro-factories making proteins by means of "genetic softwares" ; chromosomal rearrangements by means of jumper genes which enable modifications of the genetic heritage ; neutral mutants which can become active so necessary : a main fact that gives evidence of genetic potentialities which can become realities and thus, that gives evidence of ceaseless creative activities and of a primordial intention.

Double helix model of the DNA will be work of James Dewey Watson (1928 - ), Francis Harry Compton Crick (1916 - 2004) and Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins (1916 - 2004), in the 1950s.
Henceforth, we know that molecule of DNA contains water, 50 to 95 % of its weight, what is considerable and which shows again, the major part which is played by water in life's phenomenon.

And will appear then, a stumbling-block of the knowledge, diffusion of information and of directives within the beings.
Thus, in 1956, Severo Ochoa (1905 - 1993) and Arthur Kornberg (1918 - ) will discover transcription of the DNA on RNA polymerase.
Alas !, here is how scientists speak about diffusions of "sense" to molecular level:
"RNA polymerase (RNAP or RNApol) is an enzyme that makes an RNA copy of a DNA ; "RNA 3 polymerases" are responsible of the synthesis of short RNA as the RNAt ; …, RNA polymerase 2 catalyses the formation of the RNAm".
Alas, because for spirit who is in a research of primordial causes, RNA does not made, RNA is responsible for nothing, …, RNA does not catalyse : it enables diffusion, synthesis, catalysis, …, it's very different !

Stumbling- block indeed, who does speak about :
- activities of transcendent order necessary for memorization and diffusion of the "sense" ?,
- transcendent order of faculties that enable recognitions, choices, chronology's respect … ?,
- universal field of the virtualities and potentialities, of which abstraction domain is singular expression ?

Let us insist more :
"Genetic code is a vast group of triplets of nucleotides, triplets that are called codons.
Sequence of the DNA codons is converted in a sequence of RNA messenger (mRNA) by action of an enzyme, and this new sequence is transcribed by the ribosomes.
Except the initiation codons (start codon), ending codons (stop codons) or nonsense codons, several codons code same amino acid ; there are so redundancies.
This code is now demonstrated as being universal since the bacteria up to the mammals, with some exceptions.
When a cell needs proteins or enzymes, it transcribes the DNA sequence by copying it under shape of an RNA, and that, by using a specific enzyme which, itself, fabricates a RNA messenger (mRNA) identical to the sequence of DNA." (Cf. Specialized literature).

Knowing that in body billions of cells are simultaneously concerned and even if we know in detail, chemical composition of the DNA, RNA, codons, enzymes, ribosomes and others …, reading these extracts of texts, how not to challenge the current biological speeches ?
Can we believe that all these processes take place haphazardly and under "good grace" of laws and principles, without an unique creative entity who "transcends" and co-ordinates all phenomena of this dynamics ?
Certainly not and we realize how much, understanding of the life's phenomenon, calls up more than the sciences : the philosophy and theology.
Actually, of numerous scientists are aware of the problem which is put by respect of universal value’s references within the beings and by directional character of the life's evolution.
Nevertheless, in their great majority, let's dare to say it, "formated" by sectarian masters, they are convinced that there are laws and principles which govern universe, and that the organs, the cells, the genes, …, are operators.

Is it necessary to quote other examples of such speeches ? :
"Cells release messengers which act, or on cells that have made these messengers (autocrine effects), or on cells that are near (paracrine effects), or on remote cells when these messengers are transported by blood (endocrine effects)…. ,
what can make a gene, depends on its contex …,
groups of homeotic selector genes determine how different regions of an organism develop …".

Let's remind again, genes are specific means, more exactly genes are memories and vectors of directives and information which enable evolutions of the life's phenomenon , and it’s for it that they are so diverse,
a dynamics that respects value references, particularly durations because all beings's evolutions respect rigorous chronologies,
durations these intervals which are not space but of transcendent order.

Moreover, biologists speak to us about alterations which appear by hazard but with a constant rate in the time.
How, is it possible ?,
is not it necessary to reconsider hazard's understanding ?


2. 2. Potential state and actualization of potentialities (their materialization to become realities)

- Why (how) ceaseless creative activities that take place within singular domain where are memorized the genetic programs, have led to omnipresence of a bacterial world almost unchanged since about three billion years, and also, to emergence of men ?,
- what can we say about the activities that cannot be "fossilized", notably the ones which enable recognitions, judgments, selections, anticipations,…, and which express themselves by associations, agreements, harmonies, symbiosis, … ?,
- how to explain dynamics of the bacterial world which ignores basic principle of the evolution : every species progresses to reach a superior complexity ?,
- can we understand apparent superiority of certain beings of "small sizes" in front of nature's constraints ?,
- why 80 % of the multicellular beings, the arthropods, in spite of their particularly rapid development, have not a propensity towards nervous complexity ?,
- what can we say about the potential overcapacities acquired, notably overcapacities to react and to protect itself ?,
- why (conscious) creativity of our distant ancestor, the sapiens, was so primary when he had intellectual and sensory organs comparable to ours ?

It was some main interrogations and facts which show evolution of the species as correlative of ceaseless creative activities, and, also, as correlative of actualizations (materializations) of potentialities, notably genetic,
and it, in spite of, sometimes, insuperable constraints.

That is why we recognize to individuals of remarkable lineages, a “genetic potential”, not only which is characteristic of their complexity level, but also which can increase by means of ceaseless creative activities, of physical order and of transcendent order, until to attain, in particular circumstances, critical points (critical thresholds) at origin of sudden evolutions.

Let's quote other facts which give a credibility to this understanding :
- the adaptations to the environment by means of polyvalent genetic transformations which are representing of new potentialities (named exaptations by Gould and Vrba),
- the nucleotidic substitutions which are active when new environmental constraints appear (notably, that is why in the evolutions of species, there is of numerous successive periods of stability and of adaptations to the environment) ; so, more or less long periods of adaptation to the environment, correspond to lapses of time which are necessary for actualizing (so that become realities) the genetic potentialities.
- researches of biological novelties using molecular structures common to all beings,
researches which presuppose anticipations,
- the resemblance between some evolutive processes of the life's phenomenon and of the inert matter ; for example at the time of complexity's increases, between the bipolarity of the sexual reproduction mode and bipolarity of phase's transitions in the inert matter.

In reality, the periods of stability are illusory.
Life and world are fruits of continuous creations !
Moreover, the ceaseless creative activities, to the cells's level, do show that natural selection and adaptation to environment are not primordial causes which led to, which lead to evolution of the species.

As for phenomena which are said aleatory facts or fruits of the hazard :
who effects the coherent and necessary selections for surmounting inevitable extinctions which are consequences of the aleatory regroupings ?
The hazard ?
Certainly not !

2. 3. The interpretation, an absolutely necessary and universal process.

Do you believe that "reconnaissance" between the proteins and ARN (or a part of this one) can be expressed and explain only by means of some physical-chemical-mathematical formalizations ?
Evidently not, because, for example, "instructions" necessary for "body's construction", which are coded and memorized on a molecule of about "10 power minus 12" gr, must be interpreted (recognized, judged, …) as are, in human language, the letters, the words and the sentences.
Consequently, in a research of primordial causes, we cannot keep silence as for these interpretations,
and more precisely, we cannot ignore interpretation of electromagnetic waves's characteristics which are the vecteurs of biological instructions,
these electromagnetic waves which emanate of the particles, atoms and molecules constituting DNA and ARN,
under pretext that this process don't emerge of the consciousness state.

Let's consider the mimesiss (mimetisms) of evolution between individuals of different species.
All are integrated into rigorous and similar chronologies,
consequently for it, it is imperative that a same creative entity judges with same references, and utilizes them, in particular, lapses of time, durations, this intervals which are not space but of transcendent order.

The biological mutations also, are rich of information in this respect, if we interpret with more rigour, the current scientific speeches that treat of them.
Let's quote text of Michael Denton,
" two new discoveries :
- mutations's rhythm is equal to substitutions's rhythm …,
- change's rhythm, in case of numerous genes, is punctuated by a clock that is rotating, it seems, synchronically in all branchs of the life's tree … doubtless the proof, indirect, that all mutation processes which are changing the DNA sequences in the time, are led in fact, by some mechanism …
It is not doubtful that Gray, Owen and especially Robert Chambers would have seen in these results very strong arguments in favour of idea according to which evolution's course is determined, in some way, by a natural law." (cf. The Long Chain of Coincidence).
To interpret with more rigour, yes, because, we repeat again, a law, natural, even universal, is not an operator.

To analyze other biological processes would consolidate hardly more our argumentation.
Actually, all evolution modes of the life's phenomenon presuppose,
- and the use of numerous value references ; let's think for example, to references which are necessary for coherence, development and replication of the genetic patrimony : " high - down", "forward - back ", "right - left", .... ,
- and the interpretation of information and directives at the molecular level,
what, naturally, implies faculties similar to those which enable, at the conscious level, recognitions, judgments, selections, ..., decisions and actions.
Speeches over-subtle cannot mask any more these facts.

At the present time, to explain dynamics of the life’s phenomenon, numerous biologists speak to us of rigorous (primordial) instructions emitted at cells's level, instructions which would be representative of a vital principle (to explain the functions and qualities peculiar of the beings).
What incredible naivety !

Some imagine also a "mental Darwinism" and postulate "existence" within brain, of a variety generator, even of a freedom generator.
This generator would feed permanently, a bank of possible representations of the reality which would be updated with lived experiences.
By whom would these virtual representations be selected, are they selected ?
Where are these virtual representations, in what virtual field, in what transcendent beyond ?

Is it in a plan of the structure ?, as expresses it Jacques Monod :
"… plan of the structure being present in its constituents, the epigenetic construction can therefore do itself, in a autonomous way, without outside intervention, without injection of new information. Information were present in the constituents, but unexpressed.
The epigenetic construction of a structure is not a creation, it's a revelation." (Cf. Hazard and necessity - Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology).
What are primordial causes of this revelation ?

Is not it more exact to consider epigenetic construction as actualization of genetic potentialities (their materialization to become realities), and plan of the structure as a means, among others, which enables their memorization ?

As for information, particularly genetic, what is their essence, their order ?
What can we say about creative entity, "master of the sense", who recognizes them, who uses them ?


3. Emergence of the man


In the course of July, 2001, researchers Mahamat Adoum, Fanone Gongdibe, Ahounta Djimdoumalbaye and Alain Beauvilain have discovered in Djourab desert in the Chad, a proto-hominid skull, old of about 6 to 7 million years.
Denominated Toumaï, he would represent an unknown phylum, today named : Sahelanthropus tchadensis.

Detailed study of this skull will require numerous years and multiple contradictory debates.
However, whatever they are, conclusions of these debates and the new discoveries in this domain, will say to us nothing about primordial causes which have been to origin of hominids's emergence.
For that, we must abandon ordinary postulate of causality which, for example, can easily lead to believing that the man appeared only because there were some particular constraints resulting from environment.

So,
knowing that nobility and responsibility of the man originate from creative entity of transcendent order, of divine character but non-almighty, who recognizes herself in him by the me (I, ego, subject, spirit),
and although existence results from actualization of genetic potentialities (their materialization to become realities), an actualization which is conditioned by environment, individualization and personal experiences,
we shall understand better why there were during long history of life's phenomenon, there are still actualizations slightly different of identical genetic potentialities in several distinct regions,
of slightly different actualizations which led notably, to almost simultaneous emergence of the Neanderthal man and Cro-Magnon man, afterwards to emergence of the modern man.

What is necessity ?

Paul Moyne
www.paulmoyne.com